> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Jens Axboe wrote: > > You snipped the part where Linus objected to dismissing the async > > nature, I fully agree with that part. And also note in what Nick said in the referenced mail: it would be nice if someone actually _cared_ about the async nature. The fact that it has been broken from the start, and nobody noticed is a strong hint that currently there isn't anybody who does. Maybe fuse will be the first one to actually care, and then I'll bother with putting a lot of effort into it. But until someone cares, nobody will bother, and that's how it should be. That's very much in line with the evoultionary nature of kernel developments: unused features will just get broken and eventually removed. Miklos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
