Re: [PATCH 3/5] proc: Use ppos instead of m->version

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] proc: Use ppos instead of m->version
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 22:55:29 +0300
Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20200229165910.24605-4-willy@infradead.org>
User-agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)

On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 08:59:08AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> -static void *m_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos)
> +static void *m_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *ppos)

This looks like hungarian notation.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] proc: Use ppos instead of m->version
  - From: Matthew Wilcox

References:
- [PATCH 0/5] Simplify /proc/$pid/maps implementation
  - From: Matthew Wilcox
- [PATCH 3/5] proc: Use ppos instead of m->version
  - From: Matthew Wilcox

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 00/17] VFS: Filesystem information and notifications [ver #17]
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Simplify /proc/$pid/maps implementation
Previous by thread: [PATCH 3/5] proc: Use ppos instead of m->version
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 3/5] proc: Use ppos instead of m->version
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux