On Tue, 2020-03-03 at 12:23 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 3/3/20 12:02 PM, Jeff Layton wrote: > > Basically, all you'd need to do is keep a pointer to struct file in the > > internal state for the chain. Then, allow userland to specify some magic > > fd value for subsequent chained operations that says to use that instead > > of consulting the fdtable. Maybe use -4096 (-MAX_ERRNO - 1)? > > BTW, I think we need two magics here. One that says "result from > previous is fd for next", and one that says "fd from previous is fd for > next". The former allows inheritance from open -> read, the latter from > read -> write. > Do we? I suspect that in almost all of the cases, all we'd care about is the last open. Also if you have unrelated operations in there you still have to chain the fd through somehow to the next op which is a bit hard to do with that scheme. I'd just have a single magic carveout that means "use the result of last open call done in this chain". If you do a second open (or pipe, or...), then that would put the old struct file pointer and drop a new one in there. If we really do want to enable multiple opens in a single chain though, then we might want to rethink this and consider some sort of slot table for storing open fds. -- Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
