On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 03:23:51PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote: > On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 02:34:42PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 2:14 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman > > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Unlimited beers for a 21-line kernel patch? Sign me up! > > > > > > > > Totally untested, barely compiled patch below. > > > > > > Ok, that didn't even build, let me try this for real now... > > > > Some comments on the interface: > > > > O_LARGEFILE can be unconditional, since offsets are not exposed to the caller. > > > > Use the openat2 style arguments; limit the accepted flags to sane ones > > (e.g. don't let this syscall create a file). > > If we think this is worth it, might even good to either have it support > struct open_how or have it accept two flag arguments. We sure want > openat2()s RESOLVE_* flags in there. If you look at the patch I posted in this thread, I think it properly supports open_how and RESOLVE_* flags. But remember it's opening a file that is already present, in RO mode, no creation allowed, so most of the open_how interactions are limited. thanks, greg k-h