Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Allowing linkat() to replace the destination

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2020-01-17 at 14:47 +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Trond Myklebust <trondmy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > That seems to me like a "just go ahead and do it if you can justify
> > it"
> > kind of thing. It has plenty of precedent, and fits easily into the
> > existing syscall, so why do we need a face-to-face discussion?
> 
> Amir said "This sounds like a good topic to be discussed at LSF/MM
> (hint
> hint)"
> 
> Also Christoph H is okay with the idea, but suggested it should be a
> separate
> syscall and Al doesn't seem to like it.  Omar posted patches to do
> this, but
> they didn't seem to get anywhere.
> 

It sounds to me like we rather need a meta-topic about "How do we get
simple things done in the Linux fs community?"

It shouldn't take a ticket to Palm Springs to perform something simple
like adding a new flag to a syscall.

-- 
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace
trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux