Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Allowing linkat() to replace the destination

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Trond Myklebust <trondmy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> That seems to me like a "just go ahead and do it if you can justify it"
> kind of thing. It has plenty of precedent, and fits easily into the
> existing syscall, so why do we need a face-to-face discussion?

Amir said "This sounds like a good topic to be discussed at LSF/MM (hint
hint)"

Also Christoph H is okay with the idea, but suggested it should be a separate
syscall and Al doesn't seem to like it.  Omar posted patches to do this, but
they didn't seem to get anywhere.

David




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux