On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 11:52:52AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > These patches fix several issues raised at previous submissions: > > - passing NULL vfsmounts > - using nameidata > - using extra stack for vfsmount argument > > So, it seems to me that there's in fact no issues remaining and the > best excuse you can come up with is that it's a dumb idea. Well, > that's not a very imressive technical argument IMNSHO. Well, pathname based access control is a dumb idea, and we've been through this N times. You've also been told that vfs_ routines should remain without vfsmount, and no that's not a stack-related issue no idea where that part came from. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
