Re: [patch 01/15] security: pass path to inode_create

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > So again, can you offer an alternative?
> 
> Just give up on this dumb idea completely.

You mean apparmor?  I've already told you, that's not the answer.  Go
up 4 mails and read again.

You act like a happy prince of VFS, but let me tell you one thing,
there's only one king in this kingdom of Linux, and that's Linus
Torvalds I.  And our wise king already said that apparmor can come, so
the question is not "if" but "how".

If you don't want to help, that's a pity, but of course I don't want
to (and can't) force you.  I can understand if personally you don't
think this is a good idea, and don't want to have anything to do with
it.  In that case I can leave you off the CC's for the parts which are
not just generic VFS cleanups but explicitly towards apparmor
integration.  Would that suit you?

Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux