On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 08:46:32AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Sun, Oct 06, 2019 at 05:46:02PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > File systems like gfs2 don't support delayed allocations or unwritten > > extents and thus allocate normal mapped blocks to fill holes. To > > cover the case of such file systems allocating new blocks to fill holes > > also zero out mapped blocks with the new flag. > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 12 ++++++++++-- > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c > > index 23cc308f971d..4132c0cccb0a 100644 > > --- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c > > +++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c > > @@ -207,6 +207,14 @@ iomap_read_inline_data(struct inode *inode, struct page *page, > > SetPageUptodate(page); > > } > > > > +static inline bool iomap_block_needs_zeroing(struct inode *inode, > > + struct iomap *iomap, loff_t pos) > > +{ > > + return iomap->type != IOMAP_MAPPED || > > + (iomap->flags & IOMAP_F_NEW) || > > + pos >= i_size_read(inode); > > This is a change of logic - why is the IOMAP_F_NEW check added here > and what bug does it fix? Sorry, brain-fart here - that's what this patch is adding, it's not a pure factoring patch.... :/ Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx