Re: [PATCH 05/11] iomap: zero newly allocated mapped blocks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Oct 06, 2019 at 05:46:02PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> File systems like gfs2 don't support delayed allocations or unwritten
> extents and thus allocate normal mapped blocks to fill holes.  To
> cover the case of such file systems allocating new blocks to fill holes
> also zero out mapped blocks with the new flag.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> index 23cc308f971d..4132c0cccb0a 100644
> --- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> @@ -207,6 +207,14 @@ iomap_read_inline_data(struct inode *inode, struct page *page,
>  	SetPageUptodate(page);
>  }
>  
> +static inline bool iomap_block_needs_zeroing(struct inode *inode,
> +		struct iomap *iomap, loff_t pos)
> +{
> +	return iomap->type != IOMAP_MAPPED ||
> +		(iomap->flags & IOMAP_F_NEW) ||
> +		pos >= i_size_read(inode);

This is a change of logic - why is the IOMAP_F_NEW check added here
and what bug does it fix?

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux