Hi Christoph,
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 05:10:21AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > {
> > - struct erofs_vnode *vi = ptr;
> > -
> > - inode_init_once(&vi->vfs_inode);
> > + inode_init_once(&((struct erofs_inode *)ptr)->vfs_inode);
>
> Why doesn't this use EROFS_I? This looks a little odd.
Thanks for your reply and suggestion...
EROFS_I seems the revert direction ---> inode to erofs_inode
here we need "erofs_inode" to inode...
Am I missing something?.... Hope not....
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
