> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(security_inode_setattr); > > Is there any particular reason you made it EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL? It seems > like this is replacing functionality that was previously exported > without a GPL tag. I won't argue forcefully for changing it, but I > did want to mention it on the list. I understand people wanting to > make new functionality tagged that way (even though I disagree), but > this doesn't seem to fit either the notion of an internal thing that > shouldn't be touched or new functionality. It's an internal thing: no other filesystem should do this (and IMO even FAT should not, but some people seem to feel otherwise). Miklos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
