Re: [patch 21/21] slab defrag: Obsolete SLAB

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 10:38 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro
<kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > What about the TPC performance regressions? My understanding was that
> > > slub still performed worse in the "object allocated on one CPU, freed on
> > > the other CPU" type workloads due to less batching.
> >
> > Which can be the majority of object allocations and frees in some
> > workloads.  It definately wants fixing.
>
>  Agreed, that situation is very frequency happend, IMHO.

Christoph fixed a tbench regression that was in the same ballpark as
the TPC regression reported by Matthew which is why we've asked the
Intel folks to re-test. But yeah, we're working on it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux