Andrew Price <anprice@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Umm... What about the fs_context struct? Why can't that be used to > > propagate the bdev pointer? That's kind of what it's for... > > It would be useful to have the block device pointer in the fs_context since so > many of the filesystems use them and it makes for an obvious API migration. That may be so. I've argued also that we should put a net-namespace pointer in there, but Al disagreed. However, I think most bdev-based filesystems use mount_bdev() which gfs2 does not. > > It looks like you should be able to stash the bdev pointer in the gfs2_args > > struct. > > Sure, but since the new API is young I figured I'd hold off until we had this > conversation because adding it to the fs_context might be agreeable :) Note that I have patches to kill of sget_userns() and sget() will hopefully soon follow. Have a look at: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git/log/?h=mount-api-viro David