On Tue, 15 Apr 2008, Jamie Lokier wrote: > Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > > > How old? The out of tree fuse module (hoping to get rid of it soon) > > > > works down to 2.6.9. Beyond that it does probably require a fair > > > > amount of porting work. > > > > > > I imagine that backporting FUSE to 2.4 no-mmu will be more work than > > > backporting a filesystem, but I could be mistaken. Moving my project > > > to a 2.6 kernel (*any* 2.6 kernel) would be much more work than > > > either. > > > > Fuse-2.5 still supported linux-2.4. Although I have no idea if it > > works with no-mmu, maybe it's worth a try. > > > > Backporting ntfs-3g to an older version of fuse shouldn't be a big > > problem, as the fuse interface didn't change very much since then. > > Thanks for your advice. I will look into all these possibilities. > Fuse working would be quite useful in many other ways too. ntfs-3g was reported to work on 2.4 no-mmu kernels six months ago (though it had no our QA). Please see http://ntfs-3g.org/support.html#kernel24 and search for nommu on fuse-devel for the details. Szaka -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
