Re: [PATCH 0/7] OMFS filesystem version 3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 11:58 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> Oh, you mean without having to run the whole kernel around the
> filesystem?  Well, that's a bit more tricky: filesystems use not just
> the VFS API, but the block, VM, SLAB, etc. APIs as well.  Porting all
> of these to userspace and keeping them in sync with the kernel changes
> doesn't sound much fun.

That would be UML :)

But seriously -- wouldn't our time be better spent on improving error
handling in the kernel, rather than taking advantage of the benefits of
microkernel design... but only for those parts which don't matter?

-- 
dwmw2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux