Re: [PATCH v2] hugetlb: allow to free gigantic pages regardless of the configuration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/14/2019 10:52 AM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
On 2/13/19 8:30 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
-#if (defined(CONFIG_MEMORY_ISOLATION) && defined(CONFIG_COMPACTION)) || defined(CONFIG_CMA)
+#ifdef CONFIG_COMPACTION_CORE
  static __init int gigantic_pages_init(void)
  {
  	/* With compaction or CMA we can allocate gigantic pages at runtime */
diff --git a/fs/Kconfig b/fs/Kconfig
index ac474a61be37..8fecd3ea5563 100644
--- a/fs/Kconfig
+++ b/fs/Kconfig
@@ -207,8 +207,9 @@ config HUGETLB_PAGE
  config MEMFD_CREATE
  	def_bool TMPFS || HUGETLBFS
-config ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE
+config COMPACTION_CORE
  	bool
+	default y if (MEMORY_ISOLATION && MIGRATION) || CMA
This takes a hard dependency (#if) and turns it into a Kconfig *default*
that can be overridden.  That seems like trouble.

Shouldn't it be:

config COMPACTION_CORE
	def_bool y
	depends on (MEMORY_ISOLATION && MIGRATION) || CMA
Agreed. Also I noticed that it now depends on MIGRATION instead of
COMPACTION. That intention is correct IMHO, but will fail to
compile/link when both COMPACTION and CMA are disabled, and would need
more changes in mm/internal.h and mm/compaction.c (possibly just
replacing CMA in all "if defined CONFIG_COMPACTION || defined
CONFIG_CMA" instances with COMPACTION_CORE, but there might be more
problems, wanna try? :)

Let's be honest, that's a "typo" :) Migration is logical to me but
that's because I don't know much about compaction. Thanks for
noticing it.
I'll take a look at what you propose to do too.


Also, I realized that COMPACTION_CORE is a wrong name, sorry about that.
What the config really provides is alloc_contig_range(), so it should be
named either CONFIG_CMA_CORE (as it provides contiguous memory
allocation, but not the related reservation and accounting), or
something like CONFIG_CONTIG_ALLOC. I would also move it from fs/Kconfig
to mm/Kconfig.

No problem, I was not inspired either. I'll send a v3 with the renaming
you propose.

Thanks!

Thank you.

Alex




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux