Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] (again) THP for file systems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> On Feb 13, 2019, at 4:59 PM, Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> I believe the direction is clear.  It needs people to do the work.
> We're critically short of reviewers.  I got precious little review of
> the original XArray work, which made Andrew nervous and delayed its
> integration.  Now I'm getting little review of the followup patches
> to lay the groundwork for filesystems to support larger page sizes.
> I have very little patience for this situation.

I'll be happy to dive in and look at the changes from an mm point of view,
but I don't feel qualified to comment on all the file system
considerations.

Perhaps if someone from the fs side would volunteer; I know well how
frustrating it can be to be trapped in code review suspended animation.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux