> Hmm good point. How bout this? Keeps us from doing the skip thing and keeps > the garbage collector path a little cleaner. Thanks much, Well yeah, something like that. Only shrink_dcache_sb() is way overkill for shrink_dcache_parent(). We definitelty don't want to do that. But if you remove the garbage collection parts from prune_dcache() and compare that to the second pass of shrink_dcache_sb(), they look eerily similar, except one of them removes all dentries belonging to the sb, the other one only removes 'count' number of dentries. But they could possibly be merged into a common function. Miklos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
