> > probably worth looking at doing something different in the case of > > shrinking the dcache on the parent, and leaving prune_dcache to > > only be called in the case of trying to free up dcache under > > memory pressure, where the superblock doesn't actually matter. > > For the RHEL3 issue you are reffering to I fixed it by creating a > > private list when we shrunk the parent, and submitting that list > > to prune_dcache that way we didn't spend all this time looping. I > > will see what can be done for upstream. Which sounds racy with umount. A hashed dentry must either have a refcount greater than one, or be on dentry_unused list. This patch breaks that assumption. Miklos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
