On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 02:57:17PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 02:55:26PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 11:47:39AM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > > > CI filenames can work perfectly fine without adding validation of file > > > > names by treating non-conformant bytestreams as not having lower/upper > > > > case variants. > > > > > > Sorry, then I'm not understanding your objection to this patch (and I > > > don't think I understood that sentence :-). > > > > I objected to the part of the patch I've quoted (and the bitsrelated to > > it), not all of it. That how we do reviews in kernel land, not sure > > how samba handles it if you have a binary object/don't object policy.. > > oops, look like the quote actually got deleted accidentally. sorry > I'ltake that comment back. > > The part I object to are the various calls to xfs_unicode_validate > in the namespace operations. Ah, ok - now I understand - thanks ! We also have a finer-grained objection system than entire patch btw. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
