On 06.11.2018 12:33, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 10:25 AM, Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 06.11.2018 12:23, Miklos Szeredi wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 10:13 AM, Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> fuse_request_send_notify_reply() may fail, and this case >>>> it remains leaked (fuse_retrieve_end(), which is called >>>> on error path, does not do that). Also, fc->num_waiting, >>>> will never be decremented, and fuse_wait_aborted() will >>>> never finish. So, put the request patently. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Posted same patch yesterday for a syzbot report. How did you notice this? >> >> I've found this by code review. I did this last week and I have 10 patches more >> on different theme. I was waiting for when the merge window opens. > > Well, the merge window just closed. But never worry, bugfixes can go > in at anytime. > > If you notice a bug, such as this, you don't need to hold back until > any particular time, the sooner it's known, the better. Ok, no problem :) Thanks, Kirill
