> On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 19:52 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > Traditionally we have syscalls, and nfsd. Both of them want the > > security checks, and I think nfsd wants the read-only mount checking > > as well, but I'm not entirely sure. Maybe we can handle that by just > > making nfsd acquire a write-ref on the mount and keep it while it's > > exported. > > The only question for me would be where the current r/o checks are > happening (IS_RDONLY()). I generally based my patches on replacing > those calls. In may_create()/may_delete() on parent directory. So that one needs audit of all callers, unless Al can be convinced that moving those checks into the VFS makes sense. Miklos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
