On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Casey Schaufler wrote: > Oh, cut the crap. What part of my explainations don't you understand? > > I understand the functionality. That is not my point. My point is > that inode_notifysecctx() explicitly prohibits the LSM from providing > integrity of the security attributes by introducing a differentiation > between the "in-core" and "on-disk" values, and making it explicit > that the one is set, but not the other. > > Clearly this is the direction you intend to go. Have fun with it. > I've raised the issue, y'all aren't seeing it. Maybe I'm wrong, > it has happened before. Please stop trolling. - James -- James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
