Re: very poor ext3 write performance on big filesystems?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Theodore Tso schrieb:

(...)

What has helped a bit was to recreate the file system with -O^dir_index
dir_index seems to cause more seeks.

Part of it may have simply been recreating the filesystem, not
necessarily removing the dir_index feature.

You mean, copy data somewhere else, mkfs a new filesystem, and copy data back?

Unfortunately, doing it on a file level is not possible with a reasonable amount of time.

I tried to copy that filesystem once (when it was much smaller) with "rsync -a -H", but after 3 days, rsync was still building an index and didn't copy any file.


Also, as files/hardlinks come and go, it would degrade again.


Are there better choices than ext3 for a filesystem with lots of hardlinks? ext4, once it's ready? xfs?


--
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux