Re: very poor ext3 write performance on big filesystems?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 09:16:41AM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> ext3 tries to keep inodes in the same block group as their containing
> directory.  If you have lots of hard links, obviously it can't really
> do that, especially since we don't have a good way at mkdir time to
> tell the filesystem, "Psst!  This is going to be a hard link clone of
> that directory over there, put it in the same block group".

Hmm, you think such a hint interface would be worth it?

> 
> > What has helped a bit was to recreate the file system with -O^dir_index
> > dir_index seems to cause more seeks.
> 
> Part of it may have simply been recreating the filesystem, not

Undoubtedly.

> necessarily removing the dir_index feature.  Dir_index speeds up
> individual lookups, but it slows down workloads that do a readdir

But only for large directories right? For kernel source like
directory sizes it seems to be a general loss.

-Andi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux