Re: [PATCH] coredump: rename umh_pipe_setup() to coredump_pipe_setup()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coredump: rename umh_pipe_setup() to coredump_pipe_setup()
From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 03:48:51 +0100
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx>, ast@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20180510233247.GG27853@wotan.suse.de>
User-agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:32:47PM +0000, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:

> I think net-next makes sense if Al Viro is OK with that. This way it could go
> in regardless of the state of your series, but it also lines up with your work.

Fine by me...

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] coredump: rename umh_pipe_setup() to coredump_pipe_setup()
  - From: Luis R. Rodriguez

References:
- [PATCH] coredump: rename umh_pipe_setup() to coredump_pipe_setup()
  - From: Luis R. Rodriguez
- Re: [PATCH] coredump: rename umh_pipe_setup() to coredump_pipe_setup()
  - From: Alexei Starovoitov
- Re: [PATCH] coredump: rename umh_pipe_setup() to coredump_pipe_setup()
  - From: Luis R. Rodriguez

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] vfs: skip extra attributes check on removal for symlinks
Next by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH] do d_instantiate/unlock_new_inode combinations safely
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] coredump: rename umh_pipe_setup() to coredump_pipe_setup()
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] coredump: rename umh_pipe_setup() to coredump_pipe_setup()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]