On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 18:26:18 -0500 "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 09:58:59AM -0500, Oleg Drokin wrote: > > Hello! > > > > On Jan 18, 2008, at 6:07 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 02:41:57PM -0800, Marc Eshel wrote: > >>> The problem seems to be with the fact that the client and server are > >>> on > >>> the same machine. This test work fine with or without an underlaying > >>> fs > >>> that supports locking when the client and the server are on a > >>> different > >>> machines. Like you said the server is trying to send the grant > >>> message to > >>> the client but for some reason it fails when the client is on the > >>> same > >>> machine. > >> That *shouldn't* make a difference, so we need to take another look at > >> this--Oleg, this problem is still unfixed, right? > > > > Yes, I just pulled your latest nfs tree and I still can reproduce the > > problem. > > OK, we have finally reproduced this problem here, and David's working on > debugging. It does indeed seem to only be reproduceable with client and > server on the same machine. Thanks for the report.... > > --b. It might be worth testing this both with and without the patchset I posted to linux-nfs recently to take care of the lockd hang. If lockd is stuck trying to rpc_ping itself then it probably would hang like this, wouldn't it? -- Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
