Re: [2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



i reverted this commit 7d699bafe258ebd8f9b4ec182c554200b369a504 , and
now compile ...

On 2/5/08, Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:05:06 -0800, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> > Looks like you deadlocked in ub_request_fn().  I assume that you were
> using
> > ub.c in 2.6.23 and that it worked OK?  If so, we broke it, possibly via
> > changes to the core block layer.
> >
> > I think ub.c is basically abandoned in favour of usb-storage.  If so,
> > perhaps we should remove or disble ub.c?
>
> Actually I think it may be an argument for keeping ub, if ub exposes
> a bug in the __blk_end_request. I'll look at the head of the thread
> and see if Mr. Pinter has hit anything related to Mr. Ueda's work.
>
> -- Pete
>


-- 
Thanks,
Oliver
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux