Re: [2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 21:39 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:31:43 +0100 "Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér)"  <oliver.pntr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > hi all!
> > 
> > in the 2.6.24 become i some soft lockups with usb-phone, when i pluged
> > in the mobile, then the vfs-layer crashed. am afternoon can i the
> > .config send, and i bisected the kernel, when i have time.
> > 
> > pictures from crash:
> > http://students.zipernowsky.hu/~oliverp/kernel/regression_2624/
> 
> It looks like selinux's file_has_perm() is doing spin_lock() on an
> uninitialised (or already locked) spinlock.

The trace looks bogus to me - I don't see how file_has_perm() could have
been called there, and file_has_perm() doesn't directly take any spin
locks.

-- 
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux