Re: Removing GFP_NOFS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dave Chinner wrote:
> > OTOH (contradicting myself here), writepages, in essence writebacks, are
> > performed by per-BDI flusher threads which are kicked by the mm code in
> > low memory situations, as opposed to the thread performing the allocation.
> > 
> > As Tetsuo pointed out, direct reclaims are the real problematic scenarios.
> 
> Sure, but I've been saying for more than 10 years we need to get rid
> of direct reclaim because it's horribly inefficient when there's
> lots of concurrent allocation pressure, not to mention it's full of
> deadlock scenarios like this.
> 
> Really, though I'm tired of having the same arguments over and over
> again about architectural problems that people just don't seem to
> understand or want to fix.
> 
Yeah, it is sad that developers are not interested in lowmem situation.

  Suspect the MM subsystem when your Linux system hung up!?
  https://elinux.org/images/4/49/CELFJP-Jamboree63-handa-en.pdf



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux