On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 6:27 PM, Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri 27-10-17 13:53:20, Jan Kara wrote: >> On Wed 25-10-17 16:31:39, Miklos Szeredi wrote: >> > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > > We discovered some problems in the latest fsnotify/fanotify codebase with >> > > the help of a stress test (Xiong Zhou is working on upstreaming it to >> > > fstests). >> > > >> > > This series attempts to fix these. With the patch applied the stress test >> > > passes. >> > > >> > > Please review/test. >> > > >> > > Changes in v2 (only cosmetic fixes, no functional change): >> > > - split first patch into 3 parts to make it more readable >> > > - checkpatch fixes >> > > - added cleanup patch for fanotify >> > >> > Pushed v3 (again with just cosmetics) to: >> > >> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mszeredi/vfs.git fsnotify-fixes-v3 >> >> Sorry, I was at OSS Europe this week so I didn't find time to have a close >> look. I'll try to check it early next week and pick it up to my tree. >> Also thanks Amir for reviewing Miklos' patches! > > So I went through all patches and commented on those where I had some > questions / suggestions. Once those are addressed, I can pick this up to my > tree. Pushed v5 to: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mszeredi/vfs.git fsnotify-fixes-v5 Changes from v4: - address comments for fanotify cleanup patch Thanks, Miklos
