On 2017/10/30 17:21, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 10/28, Chao Yu wrote:
>> Hi Jaegeuk,
>>
>> On 2017/10/23 0:51, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> On 10/22, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>> On 2017/10/20 0:56, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>>> This case is not happening easily.
>>>>
>>>> Actually it can happen, so why not just keep it?
>>>
>>> Okay, so let me keep this patch for local stress tests only.
>>
>> May I ask which type and rate of fault injection you are using for
>> test now?
>
> I select random value between 3000 and 5000, and 255 for type.
Got it, thanks for your sharing. :)
Thanks,
>
> Thanks,
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 2 +-
>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>>>> index e0ef31cb2cc6..6301ccca8888 100644
>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>>>> @@ -1544,7 +1544,7 @@ static inline int inc_valid_block_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>>>> return ret;
>>>>>
>>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_FAULT_INJECTION
>>>>> - if (time_to_inject(sbi, FAULT_BLOCK)) {
>>>>> + if (!IS_NOQUOTA(inode) && time_to_inject(sbi, FAULT_BLOCK)) {
>>>>> f2fs_show_injection_info(FAULT_BLOCK);
>>>>> release = *count;
>>>>> goto enospc;
>>>>>
>>>
>>> .
>>>
>
> .
>
