Hi Jaegeuk,
On 2017/10/23 0:51, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 10/22, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2017/10/20 0:56, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> This case is not happening easily.
>>
>> Actually it can happen, so why not just keep it?
>
> Okay, so let me keep this patch for local stress tests only.
May I ask which type and rate of fault injection you are using for
test now?
Thanks,
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>> index e0ef31cb2cc6..6301ccca8888 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>> @@ -1544,7 +1544,7 @@ static inline int inc_valid_block_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>> return ret;
>>>
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_FAULT_INJECTION
>>> - if (time_to_inject(sbi, FAULT_BLOCK)) {
>>> + if (!IS_NOQUOTA(inode) && time_to_inject(sbi, FAULT_BLOCK)) {
>>> f2fs_show_injection_info(FAULT_BLOCK);
>>> release = *count;
>>> goto enospc;
>>>
>
> .
>
