On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 10:47:43AM +0100, David Howells wrote: > J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Does that mean nobody's tested fcntl locking over afs since that change in > > 2010? > > Quite feasibly not. I've been beating kAFS into shape and I'm aware of the > lock thing. It's on the list after getting the core server rotation working > properly since that will affect a whole bunch of code, including the locking > code. > > I've more or less finished the server rotation bit. See: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git/log/?h=afs-2-experimental Neat! Well, pending a real fix I suppose it's probably clearest to leave the locking code in an obviously broken state. Might be worth a comment though. --b.
