J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Does that mean nobody's tested fcntl locking over afs since that change in > 2010? Quite feasibly not. I've been beating kAFS into shape and I'm aware of the lock thing. It's on the list after getting the core server rotation working properly since that will affect a whole bunch of code, including the locking code. I've more or less finished the server rotation bit. See: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git/log/?h=afs-2-experimental David
