Before commit 9c5d760b8d22 ("mm: split gfp_mask and mapping flags into
separate fields") the private_* fields of struct adrress_space were grouped
together and using "ditto" in comments describing the last fields was
correct.
With introduction of gpf_mask between private_lock and private_list "ditto"
references the wrong description.
Fix it by using the elaborate description.
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/fs.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 339e73742e73..13dab191a23e 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ struct address_space {
unsigned long flags; /* error bits */
spinlock_t private_lock; /* for use by the address_space */
gfp_t gfp_mask; /* implicit gfp mask for allocations */
- struct list_head private_list; /* ditto */
+ struct list_head private_list; /* for use by the address_space */
void *private_data; /* ditto */
errseq_t wb_err;
} __attribute__((aligned(sizeof(long)))) __randomize_layout;
--
2.7.4
