On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 06:20:37PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 06:04:33PM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 04:00:07PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 01:51:51PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > > Right now we send -EAGAIN to a syfs write which got interrupted. > > > > Userspace can't tell what happened though, send -EINTR if we > > > > were killed due to a signal so userspace can tell things apart. > > > > > > > > This is only applicable to the fallback mechanism. > > > > > > > > Reported-by: Martin Fuzzey <mfuzzey@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/base/firmware_class.c | 9 ++++++--- > > > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > This doesn't need to go into 4.13-final, right? > > > > Nope. > > > > > Can it wait for 4.14-rc1? > > > > Yes. The bigger issue was the unexpected signals causing interruption. > > This I consider a secondary and not critical issue so I did not Cc stable. > > Ok, can you then take your two series of patches, and split them up into > one for 4.13-final and one for 4.14-rc1 so that I know for sure which is > which? > > As it is, I have to guess :( Sure thing. Luis
