On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 01:20:11PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: > Seriously, one has to do things in certain order. Yes… and I want to ensure that order. > There is no reason to wait for the common uuid code to settle down before > fixing something as trivial as this and it makes very little sense IMO to use > uuid_be_gen() for sb->s_uuid as it is now. There is. generate_random_uuid needs to die, and adding more callers isn't the way to go. Same for ubifs btw.
