Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > krealloc would probably be more efficient and possible > > > readable as likely there's already padding in the original > > > allocation. > > > > The problem is if krealloc() fails: you've lost all those pointers to things > > you then need to free. > > Huh? How could that happen? > > krealloc must always use a temporary. > If krealloc returns NULL, the original allocation is kept. Hmmm... Good point. David
