Re: Treat REQ_FUA and REQ_PREFLUSH as synchronous

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/02/2017 08:45 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 12:21:23PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
>> it makes sense to treat REQ_FUA and REQ_PREFLUSH ops as synchronous in
>> op_is_sync() since callers cannot rely on this anyway... Thoughts?
> 
> I'm fine with treating them as sync.

Yes me too. It makes sense to do so implicitly, and it avoids having
to go and add REQ_SYNC in a bunch of places. That will also be more
error proof in the future.

Jan, will you send a patch for that?

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux