Re: Treat REQ_FUA and REQ_PREFLUSH as synchronous

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Treat REQ_FUA and REQ_PREFLUSH as synchronous
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 07:45:05 -0700
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20170502102123.GE13916@quack2.suse.cz>
User-agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23)

On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 12:21:23PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> it makes sense to treat REQ_FUA and REQ_PREFLUSH ops as synchronous in
> op_is_sync() since callers cannot rely on this anyway... Thoughts?

I'm fine with treating them as sync.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Treat REQ_FUA and REQ_PREFLUSH as synchronous
  - From: Jens Axboe

References:
- Treat REQ_FUA and REQ_PREFLUSH as synchronous
  - From: Jan Kara

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 4/6] proc: support mounting private procfs instances inside same pid namespace
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: publish UUID in struct super_block
Previous by thread: Treat REQ_FUA and REQ_PREFLUSH as synchronous
Next by thread: Re: Treat REQ_FUA and REQ_PREFLUSH as synchronous
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux