On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 5:58 PM, Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I have no problem merging this patch into audit/next for v4.12, would >> you prefer me to do that so at least this patch is merged? > > This would be fine. > But, I think whoever takes the last 2 deletion patches should also take them. > I'm not sure how that part works out. > >> It would probably make life a small bit easier for us in the audit >> world too as it would reduce the potential merge conflict. However, >> that's a relatively small thing to worry about. As Andrew has picked the remaining patches up into -mm, this will work out fine: any patches picked up by the respective maintainers for v4.12 should arrive as git pull requests before the -mm patches get applied at a later stage of the merge window. Arnd