Re: [PATCH 06/12] audit: Use timespec64 to represent audit timestamps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I have no problem merging this patch into audit/next for v4.12, would
> you prefer me to do that so at least this patch is merged?

This would be fine.
But, I think whoever takes the last 2 deletion patches should also take them.
I'm not sure how that part works out.

> It would probably make life a small bit easier for us in the audit
> world too as it would reduce the potential merge conflict.  However,
> that's a relatively small thing to worry about.

-Deepa



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux