On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 09:51:48PM +0100, Andi Drebes wrote: > Hi! > > > I would suggest you to use squashfs instead of cramfs. > > First, it's newer, it's better, it's actively developed, it doesn't have any > > limits like the bad cramfs. > I'm developing a new linux based firmware for my router which uses cramfs. > Switching to squashfs still needs some time. Meanwhile, I have to work with > cramfs. As the router uses the big endian format and as my machine works with > the little endian format, I'm unable to mount the router's filesystem images. Making cramfs endianess-independent shouldn't be much work. Take a look at the helpers in fs/ufs/swab.h and use them for every ondisk access in cramfs. Drop me a not if you need some help. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
