Re: cramfs in big endian

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> I would suggest you to use squashfs instead of cramfs.
> First, it's newer, it's better, it's actively developed, it doesn't have any
> limits like the bad cramfs. 
I'm developing a new linux based firmware for my router which uses cramfs. 
Switching to squashfs still needs some time. Meanwhile, I have to work with 
cramfs. As the router uses the big endian format and as my machine works with 
the little endian format, I'm unable to mount the router's filesystem images.


	Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux