On 2017/3/9 5:35, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > On 03/08, Chao Yu wrote: >> On 2017/3/7 5:51, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: >>> If f2fs_new_inode() is failed, the bad inode will invalidate 0'th node page >>> during f2fs_evict_inode(), which doesn't need to do. >> >> Hmm...should not allow other using of inode->i_ino in following codes of >> f2fs_evict_inode, right? > > Right. I mean those codes below invalidate_mapping_pages(NODE_MAPPING(sbi),,) After having a look at them, I think it's OK without any change. :) Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks,
