On 2017/3/7 5:51, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> If f2fs_new_inode() is failed, the bad inode will invalidate 0'th node page
> during f2fs_evict_inode(), which doesn't need to do.
Hmm...should not allow other using of inode->i_ino in following codes of
f2fs_evict_inode, right?
Thanks,
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/inode.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inode.c b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
> index 24bb8213d974..ef8610bf950f 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
> @@ -411,7 +411,10 @@ void f2fs_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
> stat_dec_inline_dir(inode);
> stat_dec_inline_inode(inode);
>
> - invalidate_mapping_pages(NODE_MAPPING(sbi), inode->i_ino, inode->i_ino);
> + /* ino == 0, if f2fs_new_inode() was failed t*/
> + if (inode->i_ino)
> + invalidate_mapping_pages(NODE_MAPPING(sbi), inode->i_ino,
> + inode->i_ino);
> if (xnid)
> invalidate_mapping_pages(NODE_MAPPING(sbi), xnid, xnid);
> if (inode->i_nlink) {
>
