On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 10:55:23AM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote: > Hi Ted, > > On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 06:13:30PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm trying to backport a security fix involving the mount namespaces > > (in fs/pnode.c), and I'm wondering if anyone has a set of sanity > > checks (ideally in the form of a shell script) which they use to make > > sure nothing has broken with respect to mount --make-shared, et. al. > > > > I've really gotten spoiled with xfstests, and the mount namespaces > > code looks subtle and quick to anger, and I'd prefer to have something > > more substantial than "It builds! Release it to production!" :-) > > AFAIK, there's a test script from LTP does some mount namespace function > and regression tests, e.g. --bind --make-private --make-shared --move > > $LTP_SOURCE/testscripts/test_fs_bind.sh > > And Zorro Lang has proposed some mount tests[1] for xfstests last May, > but the tests never got reviewed & merged (hope they can be reviewed & > committed by this opportunity :). > > Thanks, > Eryu > > [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/fstests/msg03029.html If Ted or someone would like to review these patches, I really appreciate that :) Thanks, Zorro
