Re: Does anyone have test cases for mount namespaces?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Ted,

On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 06:13:30PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm trying to backport a security fix involving the mount namespaces
> (in fs/pnode.c), and I'm wondering if anyone has a set of sanity
> checks (ideally in the form of a shell script) which they use to make
> sure nothing has broken with respect to mount --make-shared, et. al.
> 
> I've really gotten spoiled with xfstests, and the mount namespaces
> code looks subtle and quick to anger, and I'd prefer to have something
> more substantial than "It builds!  Release it to production!"  :-)

AFAIK, there's a test script from LTP does some mount namespace function
and regression tests, e.g. --bind --make-private --make-shared --move

$LTP_SOURCE/testscripts/test_fs_bind.sh

And Zorro Lang has proposed some mount tests[1] for xfstests last May,
but the tests never got reviewed & merged (hope they can be reviewed &
committed by this opportunity :).

Thanks,
Eryu

[1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/fstests/msg03029.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux